Home Speedy Trial Firearms Case

Speedy Trial Win: A FrizWoods Case Study

Background

In this case, our client faced serious firearms charges, including Loaded Handgun on Person and Handgun in Vehicle - offenses carrying significant legal consequences. The client was arrested and charged, but through strategic advocacy and a deep understanding of constitutional protections, FrizWoods secured a full dismissal of the case.

What made this case unique was the prosecution’s delay in bringing the matter to trial-an issue that directly implicated the client’s Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial.

The Challenge

After the initial arrest, the State entered a Nolle Prosequi (dismissal) on the original charges but later refiled them months later under a new case number. Despite the re-filing, the State failed to provide timely discovery or advance the case toward trial.

This procedural delay created an opportunity for FrizWoods to advocate for dismissal based on violations of the client’s constitutional rights.

Our Strategic Approach

1. Immediate Assertion of Speedy Trial Rights

• From the moment we were retained, we aggressively protected our client’s rights by filing a formal demand for a speedy trial-not once, but three separate times at key stages of the proceedings.

2. In-Depth Legal Analysis and Motion Practice

• Our team meticulously analyzed the timeline of events and filed a comprehensive Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Speedy Trial.
• We applied the Barker v. Wingo balancing test, focusing on four critical factors:
  1. Length of the Delay - Nearly nine months passed between the arrest and the scheduled trial, far exceeding the expected timeline for misdemeanor firearms charges.
  2. Reason for the Delay - The prosecution provided no justification for the lengthy delay, despite the straightforward nature of the case.
  3. Assertion of Rights - We demonstrated that the client had continuously asserted their right to a speedy trial.
  4. Presumed Prejudice - The prolonged delay created a legal presumption of prejudice, negatively impacting the client’s ability to mount a full defense.

3. Forcing the State’s Hand

• We filed multiple motions demanding discovery and accountability, ensuring the Court was aware of the prosecution’s failure to act within constitutional limits.
• By leveraging both Maryland Rule 4-271 (governing trial timelines) and federal constitutional protections, we created a compelling case for dismissal.

The Outcome

The Court agreed with our analysis and granted our Motion to Dismiss, leading to:

• Full dismissal of all charges
• No criminal record for our client
• Complete vindication under the law

This result underscored the importance of constitutional advocacy and highlighted how procedural rights can be a powerful defense tool.

Why This Case Matters

This case showcases how FrizWoods:

• Holds the prosecution accountable for delays and procedural missteps
• Utilizes constitutional protections as a defense weapon
• Refuses to settle for anything less than the best outcome for our clients

Many clients fear that technical violations like speedy trial delays won’t matter-but this case is proof that the law is on your side when it’s applied strategically.

Facing Firearms Charges? Timing Matters.

If you’re charged with firearms offenses or any crime where speedy trial rights could play a role, contact FrizWoods Criminal Defense today. We fight not just on the facts-but on the law-to secure the best results for our clients.

FAQs

Q: What is the “right to a speedy trial”?

A: Under the Sixth Amendment, individuals charged with a crime have the right to be tried within a reasonable time. Delays can violate this right, leading to potential dismissal of charges.

Q: How long is too long for a trial delay in Circuit Court?

A: In Maryland, under Rule 4-271, trials should generally occur within 180 days of a defendant’s first appearance or the entry of defense counsel. Delays beyond this can raise constitutional concerns.

Q: Can my case be dismissed for procedural violations?

A: Yes. If the State fails to follow constitutional or procedural rules-such as speedy trial requirements-your case may be eligible for dismissal. An experienced defense attorney can identify these opportunities.

Contact FrizWoods for a free consultation. Justice delayed should not be justice denied.